AfAmariano

     Why is it that Ellison chose to have the narrator reveal the truth of the story at the very end? Well I figure it’s because it’s not supposed to be a great revelation, the narrator’s actually showed us the whole time. I think what makes this novel particularly interesting after reading “Native Son” is the contrast between third and first person. Unlike “Native Son” the narrator chooses specific moments to share with the reader. Like Mr. Mitchell said in class, the narrator writes with an audience in mind. To me that means his accumulative revelations that he shows us are meant to be seen through a lens of current understanding. That might not make sense right away but here’s what I’m trying to say. The story is a first person frame narrative, so there are two layers. In the lens most zoomed in we are just following the narrators actions. In the second lens, we see the big picture. It’s in the second lens that we are meant to view the story because the narrator is training us as